All posts by admin

Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) Reporting (Korean Version)

내년부터 다수의 소규모 비즈니스가 미국 재무부 산하 Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)에 BOI 보고서를 제출해야 한다. 이를 준수하지 않을 경우 상당한 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으며, 심지어 징역형에 처해질 수도 있다는 점을 인지해야 한다.

BOI reporting 요건은 2021년 Corporate Transparency Act (P.L. 116-283)을 통해 제정된 자금세탁 방지 대안으로, FinCEN에 BOI를 보고하도록 의무화한다. 이 요건은 대부분의 회사에 적용된다.

BOI 보고는 불투명한 기업 구조 뒤에 정체를 숨기고 미국 금융 시스템을 악용하는 악의적 행위자를 적발하는 데 도움이 될 기업투명성법을 시행하기 위한 중요한 단계다.

신고해야 하나요?

비즈니스가 법인(S 법인 또는 C 법인) 또는 유한책임회사(LLC) 인 경우, 면제 자격이 없는 한 BOI 보고서를 제출해야 할 수 있다. 주요 고려 사항에는 회사 설립 과정에서 secretary of state 또는 유사한 office에 서류를 제출해야 했는지 여부가 포함된다. The Corporate Transparency에는 정규직 직원 수 20명 이상, 총 수입액 500만 달러 이상 등의 기준을 포함하여 23가지 면제 요건이 명시되어 있다.

제출 날짜는?

2024년 1월 1일 이후에 설립 또는 등록한 보고 기업은 회사 설립 또는 등록 통지를 받은 후 30일 이내에 최초 BOI 보고서를 제출해야 한다. 2024년 1월 1일 이전에 비즈니스를 시작하거나 등록한 보고 기업은 2025년 1월 1일까지 초기 BOI 보고서를 제출할 수 있는 추가 기한이 주어진다.

무엇을 신고해야 하나요?

기본적인 비즈니스 세부 정보 외에도 BOI 보고서에는 회사의 각 실소유주에 대한 개인 정보를 포함하도록 규정하고 있다. 수익적 소유자는 보고 회사에 대한 실질적인 통제권 또는 소유권(최소 25%)을 가진 모든 개인이 될 수 있다. 이름, 생년월일, 집 주소 등과 같은 구체적인 세부 정보가 필요하다.

업데이트 및 수정

신고한 세부 정보에 변경 사항이 있거나 제출 후 부정확한 내용이 확인되는 경우, 30일 이내에 FinCEN에 정보를 업데이트하거나 수정할 수 있다.

소규모 기업 규정 준수 가이드

FinCEN이 월요일에 게시한 소규모 기업 규정 준수 가이드는 각 BOI 보고 규칙 조항을 설명하고, 주요 질문에 대한 답변을 제공하며, 대화형 체크리스트, 인포그래픽 및 기타 도구를 제공하여 기업의 규정 준수에 도움을 준다.  이 가이드는 BOI 보고 규칙을 준수하기 위한 6가지 주요 질문을 다룬다:

  • 회사에서 수익적 소유자를 신고해야 하나요?
  • 회사의 실소유주는 누구인가요?
  • 회사에서 회사 지원자를 신고해야 하나요?
  • 회사에서 보고해야 하는 구체적인 정보는 무엇인가요?
  • 우리 회사는 언제 어떻게 초기 BOI 보고서를 제출해야 하나요?
  • 보고된 정보에 변경 사항이나 부정확한 내용이 있으면 어떻게 하나요?

 

소규모 기업 규정 준수 가이드:
BOI Small Compliance Guide (fincen.gov)

Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) Reporting (English Version)

Starting next year, a vast number of small businesses will need to submit a BOI report to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a division of the U.S. Department of Treasury. It is essential to be aware that non-compliance may result in significant civil and criminal penalties, which could even lead to imprisonment.

The BOI reporting requirement is an anti-money laundering initiative enacted through the Corporate Transparency Act, P.L. 116-283, in 2021 that mandates BOI be reported to FinCEN. The requirement would apply to most companies.

The BOI reporting a critical step towards implementing the Corporate Transparency Act, which will help the Treasury Department and FinCEN expose bad actors abusing the U.S. financial system by hiding their identity behind opaque corporate structures.

Do You need to File?

If your business is a corporation (S corp or C corp) or a limited liability company (LLC), you may need to file a BOI report, unless you qualify for an exemption. Key factors include whether you had to file any documents during the formation of your company with the secretary of state or similar offices. The Corporate Transparency Act outlines 23 exemptions, including criteria like having over 20 full-time employees and more than $5 million in gross receipts.

Filing Date?

Reporting companies created or registered on or after January 1, 2024, will have 30 days after receiving notice of their company’s creation or registration to file their initial BOI reports. Reporting companies created or registered to do business before January 1, 2024, will have additional time — until January 1, 2025 — to file their initial BOI reports.

What needs to be Reported?

Beyond basic business details, the BOI report mandates the inclusion of personal information for each beneficial owner of the company. A beneficial owner can be any individual with substantial control or ownership (at least 25%) over the reporting company. Specific details such as names, birthdates, home addresses, and more are required.

Updates and Corrections

Should there be any changes in the reported details or if inaccuracies are identified post-submission, you have a 30-day window to update or correct the information with FinCEN.

The Small Entity Compliance Guide

The Small Entity Compliance Guide, which FinCEN posted Monday, describes each of the BOI reporting rules provisions; answers key questions; and provides interactive checklists, infographics, and other tools to assist businesses with compliance.  The guide addresses six key questions for complying with the BOI reporting rule:

  • Does my company have to report its beneficial owners?
  • Who is a beneficial owner of my company?
  • Does my company have to report its company applicants?
  • What specific information does my company need to report?
  • When and how should my company file its initial BOI report?
  • What if there are changes or inaccuracies in reported information?

 

The Small Entity Compliance Guide:
BOI Small Compliance Guide (fincen.gov)

California Further Limits Application of P.L. 86-272 Protection To E-commerce

In Technical Advice Memorandum 2022-01 (TAM), California's Franchise Tax Board (FTB) examined the scope of P.L. 86-272's protections, especially in the context of online activities and remote work. This memorandum largely mirrors the Multistate Tax Commission (MTC)'s prior guidelines and concludes that various online activities can make a taxpayer ineligible for the protections under P.L. 86-272. Such disqualifying online activities include offering after-sales support via chat or email, accepting branded credit card applications, taking in job applications for non-sales roles, and installing cookies on users' devices.

 

For those of you who are not familiar with P.L. 86-272, it is a federal law preventing a state from imposing a net income tax on any person’s income derived within the state from interstate commerce if the only business activity performed in the state is the solicitation of orders of tangible personal property; such orders are sent outside the state for approval or rejection; and the orders, if approved, are filled by shipment or delivery from a point outside the state.

 

The TAM also stipulates that regular telecommuting from California would void these protections, unless the in-state activities are solely supportive of sales of tangible personal property. Businesses with websites or remote workers in California should critically evaluate how the TAM affects them, particularly if they currently depend on P.L. 86-272 protections or are subject to California's income tax apportionment throwback rule.

 

California is the pioneer state to enforce the MTC's definitions of protected and non-protected internet-based activities, applying its interpretation retroactively. States like New York, New Jersey, and Oregon are contemplating similar moves, although California's interpretation has already faced legal challenges from the American Catalog Mailers Association.

 

The future remains uncertain regarding how many states will adopt the MTC's updated guidelines and whether they'll enforce them retroactively or going forward. The evolving interpretation of P.L. 86-272 adds complexity for both states and taxpayers, limiting its original protective scope even further.  Taxpayers should engage in diligent review and planning to navigate these shifting tax obligations.

 

Link to TAM 2022-01  Technical Advice Memorandum 2022-01

Businesses must electronically file Form 8300, Report of Cash Payments Over $10,000, beginning January 1, 2024 (Korean Version)

IRS에서는 2024년 1월 1일부터 사업체가 Form 8300, 10,000달러 초과 현금 지급 보고서를 전자 방식으로 제출하도록 의무화하는 IR-2023-157을 발표했다.

10,000달러를 초과하는 현금을 수령하는 비즈니스의 경우 미국 정부에 거래를 보고해야한다. 대부분의 현금 거래는 합법적이지만, Form 8300에 제공된 데이터는 탈세, 불법 마약 거래, 테러리스트 자금 조달 및 기타 범죄 활동에 대처하는 데 도움이 될 수 있다.

Form 8300은 현금을 수령한 다음 날로부터 15일 이내에 제출해야한다. 이 기한이 주말이나 공휴일인 경우 다음 영업일에 제출해야한다.

Form 8300의 새로운 전자 제출 요건은 Form 1099 시리즈 및 Form W-2와 같은 다른 정보 보고서를 이미 전자 방식으로 제출하도록 의무화된 사업체에 적용된다. 전자 제출 및 커뮤니케이션 옵션으로의 전환은 IRS와의 상호 작용을 간소화하기 위해 고안되었다. 2024 회계연도부터 Form 8300 이외의 정보 보고서를 10개 이상 제출해야 하는 사업체는 모든 Form 8300(및 해당 연도에 필요한 기타 특정 유형의 정보 보고서)을 전자 방식으로 제출해야한다.

Form 8300을 정확하게 정시에 제출하지 않을 경우 과태료가 부과될 수 있다. 제출 지연 또는 부정확성에 대한 합리적인 사유를 입증하지 못하면 벌금이 부과될 수 있다. 현금 보고 요건을 고의 또는 고의로 무시하는 경우 최소 25,000달러의 벌금이 부과될 수 있다. 또한, 신고를 회피하도록 유도하거나 유도하려고 시도하는 경우, 중대한 누락이나 허위 진술이 포함된 신고서를 제출하는 경우, 신고를 회피하기 위해 거래를 구조화하는 경우에도 벌금이 부과될 수 있다. 이러한 위반 행위는 형사 기소될 수도 있으며, 개인은 최대 5년의 징역 또는 최대 25만 달러, 법인은 최대 50만 달러의 벌금 또는 두 가지 모두에 처해질 수 있다.

아래 링크를 클릭하면 IR-2023-157을 열람할 수 있다.

Businesses must electronically file Form 8300, Report of Cash Payments Over $10,000, beginning January 1, 2024 | Internal Revenue Service (irs.gov)

Businesses must electronically file Form 8300, Report of Cash Payments Over $10,000, beginning January 1, 2024 (English Version)

The Internal Revenue Service issued IR-2023-157 mandating that businesses must electronically file Form 8300, Report of Cash Payments Over $10,000, effective January 1, 2024.

For businesses receiving cash amounts exceeding $10,000, reporting transactions to the U.S. government is required. While most cash transactions are legitimate, the data provided on Forms 8300 can aid in combating tax evasion, illicit drug trade, terrorist financing, and other criminal activities. Timely, accurate, and complete submissions on Forms 8300 can often enable the government to trace funds linked to such unlawful activities.

Forms 8300 should be filed by the 15th day following the receipt of cash. If this due date falls on a weekend or holiday, the filing should occur on the next business day.

This new e-filing requirement for Forms 8300 is applicable to businesses that are already mandated to electronically file other information returns like the Forms 1099 series and Forms W-2. This shift to electronic filing and communication options is designed to simplify interactions with the IRS. Commencing from the calendar year 2024, businesses must e-file all Forms 8300 (and certain other specified types of information returns required for that year) if they are obligated to file at least 10 information returns other than Form 8300.

Noncompliance with the accurate and punctual filing of Form 8300 may result in penalties. Failure to demonstrate reasonable cause for filing delays or inaccuracies could lead to penalties. Intentional or willful disregard of cash reporting requirements may incur a minimum penalty of $25,000. Penalties can also be imposed for inducing or attempting to induce a business to evade filing, submitting a report with material omissions or misstatements, or structuring transactions to avoid reporting. These violations might also face criminal prosecution, potentially resulting in up to 5 years of imprisonment or fines of up to $250,000 for individuals and $500,000 for corporations, or both.

Clink the link below to view IR-2023-157.

Businesses must electronically file Form 8300, Report of Cash Payments Over $10,000, beginning January 1, 2024 | Internal Revenue Service (irs.gov)

IRS’ New Compliance Campaign on “Inflated” COGS

The IRS has recently announced a new compliance campaign that will focus on large businesses suspected of inflating their cost of goods sold (COGS) to reduce their taxable income. This announcement was made on August 8, 2023, by the IRS Large Business & International Division (LB&I).  LB&I Active Campaigns | Internal Revenue Service (irs.gov)

Compliance campaigns are strategic initiatives aimed at identifying potential tax compliance risks. In this case, LB&I has utilized data analysis and suggestions from IRS compliance employees to identify areas of concern. The overarching goal of these campaigns is to enhance the selection of tax returns, pinpoint issues that carry a risk of non-compliance, and optimize the allocation of limited resources for enforcement.

While the exact details of the campaign's focus weren't explicitly provided, the use of the term "inflated" implies that the IRS is particularly concerned about taxpayers who may be overstating their expenses related to the cost of goods sold. This could involve situations where taxpayers are claiming costs that are not eligible to be counted as inventory or are using incorrect methods to determine their year-end inventory balance.

The introduction of this new campaign suggests that the IRS might intensify its scrutiny of companies that report substantial costs of goods sold. Companies selected for examination under this campaign could expect to receive detailed Information Document Request (IDR) notices pertaining to the calculation of inventory costs and the cost of goods sold for federal income tax purposes. These companies should be prepared to address these inquiries.

Taxpayers who fall under the scope of this campaign should review their current practices for determining inventory balances and making tax adjustments, such as those outlined in IRC (Internal Revenue Code) sections 263A and 471. Ensuring that these methods are accurately reflected in their tax returns will be important to avoid potential compliance issues under the new campaign.

It's important for affected taxpayers to work closely with their tax advisors to navigate these requirements and respond appropriately to any requests from the IRS. By doing so, they can minimize the risk of non-compliance and potentially avoid legal consequences.

Proposed Legislation to Strengthen US-Taiwan Economic Ties through Tax Treaty-like Agreement

In light of increasing tensions with China and to bolster economic ties with Taiwan's chip manufacturers, the United States Congress is moving forward to adopt a treaty-like agreement with Taiwan to provide relief from double taxation for businesses engaged in cross-border activities. The legislation, released on July 12, aims to reduce withholding taxes on certain US source payments received by or paid to residents of Taiwan and apply permanent establishment rules to determine tax liabilities. To qualify for the benefits of the legislation, foreign persons must meet specific criteria as "qualified residents of Taiwan." The provisions would only come into effect after Taiwan reciprocates the benefits to US persons.

Reduction of Withholding Taxes

The legislation seeks to reduce the current 30% statutory rate of US federal income tax on specific US source payments (e.g., interest, dividends, and royalties) received by or paid to residents of Taiwan.

Under the proposed legislation, the reduced rates would be 10% for interest and royalty payments, and 15% for dividends.  Dividends may be further reduced to 10% (excluding dividends paid by Regulated Investment Companies) if certain conditions are met. These conditions include being a qualified resident of Taiwan and holding at least 10% of the relevant stock directly for 12 months prior to the ex-dividend date.

Permanent Establishment

Currently, US federal income tax law taxes income that is "effectively connected" with a foreign person's trade or business within the United States at regular income tax rates. The legislation proposes substituting the term "a United States permanent establishment of a qualified resident of Taiwan" for "a trade or business within the United States" in determining tax liabilities.

The term "permanent establishment" may be established through a fixed place of business or through agents authorized to conclude binding contracts in the United States on behalf of the qualified resident of Taiwan.

Qualified Residents of Taiwan

To be eligible for the benefits of the legislation, foreign persons must qualify as "qualified residents of Taiwan."  A person is considered a "qualified resident of Taiwan" if they are subject to tax in Taiwan based on factors such as domicile, residence, place of management, place of incorporation, or similar criteria.  The person must not be a US person, and corporations must meet specific tests resembling the 2016 US Model Treaty's Limitation on Benefits (LOB) article.

Effective Dates

The provisions of the legislation will take effect upon enactment, applicable to amounts paid during relevant periods. The benefits will only apply after the US Treasury Secretary confirms that Taiwan has granted reciprocal benefits to US persons.

US Estate Tax Implications for Non-US Citizens

Residing in the United States offers varying degrees of flexibility for both resident and nonresident aliens. However, regardless of their duration of stay, non-US citizens may face significant US estate tax consequences if they do not engage in careful planning prior to their demise.

In the United States, estate and gift taxation apply to US citizens and US domiciliaries, subjecting them to a maximum tax rate of 40%. They are granted an exemption amount of $10 million, adjusted for inflation. On the other hand, non-US domiciliaries are also subject to US estate and gift taxation on certain types of US assets, with the same maximum tax rate of 40%. However, they are eligible for a significantly lower exemption of only $60,000, which solely applies to transfers upon death.

Determining domicile for estate and gift tax purposes is a distinct process from determining US income tax residence. Various factors are considered to ascertain US domicile, including statements of intent found in visa applications, tax returns, wills, and other relevant documents. Additional factors include the length of US residence, possession of a green card, lifestyle both in the US and abroad, ties to the individual's former country, country of citizenship, location of business interests, and affiliations with clubs, churches, voting registration, and driver licenses. Failure to meet the established criteria through a facts and circumstances test results in the individual being considered a non-US domiciliary for estate and gift tax purposes. It's important to note that an individual can be considered a domiciliary by multiple countries, and certain assets may be subject to estate or gift tax in more than one jurisdiction.

Tax treaties play a crucial role in defining domicile, resolving dual-domicile issues, mitigating or eliminating double taxation, and providing additional deductions and tax relief. As of January 2022, the US has estate and/or gift tax treaties in place with 16 jurisdictions, including Japan, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Austria. These treaties establish rules and guidelines to ensure fair and equitable treatment of taxpayers. However, it's important to be aware that not all countries have such tax treaties in effect with the United States. For instance, there is currently no estate and gift tax treaty between the US and Korea.

Similar to US citizens, US domiciliaries are liable to be taxed on the value of their worldwide assets upon death, meaning that their estate, regardless of its location, is subject to US estate tax. Conversely, non-US domiciliaries are solely taxed on the value of their US "situs" assets. US situs assets generally include real estate, tangible personal property situated in the US, business assets located within the US, and stocks of US corporations. The definition of US situs assets may be influenced by applicable estate and gift tax treaties.

Regarding gift tax, US citizens and domiciliaries are subject to tax on all lifetime gifts, regardless of the location of the property. In contrast, non-US domiciliaries are only subject to US gift tax on transfers of tangible personal property and real property located in the US.

To minimize the impact of estate and gift taxes, individuals can take advantage of available annual exclusions or deductions, including marital or other deductions. The remaining exemption amount can then be used to offset taxable gifts or bequests. It's important to note that any portion of the exemption used during an individual's lifetime will not be available as an exemption upon their death. Non-US domiciliaries have no exemption amount available for lifetime transfers, and the exemption amount for transfers upon death by non-US domiciliaries is only $60,000.

Additionally, individuals should consider the generation-skipping transfer tax (GST tax) alongside estate and gift taxes. The GST tax is imposed in addition to estate or gift taxes and applies to certain transfers made to beneficiaries who are two or more generations below the donor, such as grandchildren. The GST tax also applies to gifts made to unrelated individuals who are more than 37.5 years younger than the donor. However, certain circumstances may allow for a GST annual exclusion, and there exists a GST exemption that exempts $12,060,000 (the same as the estate and gift tax exemption, adjusted for inflation) of assets from the GST tax.

Non-US citizens who reside, work, or own property in the US must have a comprehensive understanding of the potential implications arising from US estate and gift tax rules. Residency and domicile choices carry significant tax implications that can impact an individual's financial planning and wealth preservation strategies. It is highly advisable for individuals in such situations to seek the guidance of an international estate planning professional to assess the impact and develop an appropriate approach based on their individual circumstances.

A crucial caveat to consider is that the current exemption amount of $12,060,000 is temporary and applicable only until 2025. Unless Congress enacts permanent changes, the exemption will revert to $5.49 million (adjusted for inflation) after 2025. Therefore, it is essential for individuals to explore how to make the most of this increased exemption before it expires.

Additionally, US citizens who renounce their citizenship and long-term residents (as defined in IRC section 877(e)) who end their US resident status may be subject to expatriation tax under IRC section 877A. Covered individuals are subject to income tax on the net unrealized gain in the year of expatriation as if the property had been sold for its fair market value ("mark-to-market tax"). Additional information will be furnished on our next newsletter.

As global mobility becomes increasingly prevalent among individuals and companies, more people will be affected by multinational tax rules. It is crucial for individuals acquiring US property or planning to move to the US to carefully consider the necessary steps to ensure they are adequately prepared for potential US estate and gift tax implications.

미국 비시민권자에게 미국 상속세가 미치는 영향

미국에 거주하는 것은 거주자와 비거주자 모두에게 다양한 유연성을 제공한다. 하지만 미국 비시민권자는 체류 기간과는 상관없이 사망 전에 신중한 계획을 세우지 않을 경우 상당한 미국 상속세의 영향을 받을 수 있다.

미국에서는 상속 및 증여세에 대한 과세가 미국 시민 및 미국 거주자에게 적용되어 최대 40%의 세율이 부과된다. 그들은 인플레이션에 따라 조정되는 1,000만 달러의 면제액을 받을 수 있다. 한편, 미국 거주자가 아닌 사람들도 특정 유형의 미국 자산에 대해 미국 상속세와 증여세 과세를 받으며 최대 40%의 세율이 적용된다. 하지만, 그들은 사망 시에만 적용되는 6만 달러의 매우 낮은 면제액을 받을 수 있다.

미국 상속 및 증여세 목적의 거주지 결정은 미국 소득세 목적의 거주지 결정과는 다른 절차로 비자 신청서, 세금 신고서, 유언서 및 기타 관련 문서 등 여러 가지 요소가 고려된다. 미국 체류 기간, 영주권 소지 여부, 미국 내외에서의 생활 방식, 출신 국가와 국적, 사업 관심사의 위치, 클럽, 교회, 투표 등록 및 운전 면허증 등이 추가적인 고려 요소이다. 이러한 사실과 상황을 테스트하여 정해진 기준을 충족하지 못할 경우 해당 개인은 상속 및 증여세 목적으로 미국 비거주자로 간주된다. 중요한 점은 개인이 여러 국가에서 거주자로 간주될 수 있으며, 특정 자산은 여러 관할구역에서 상속 및 증여세의 대상이 될 수 있다는 것이다.

조세조약은 거주지를 정의하고 이중 거주지 문제를 해결하며 이중 과세를 완화하거나 제거하고 추가 공제와 세금 혜택을 제공하는 데 중요한 역할을 한다. 2022년 1월 기준으로, 미국은 일본, 캐나다, 영국, 오스트리아를 포함한 16개 국가와 상속 및 증여세 조약을 체결하였다. 이러한 조약은 납세자에 대한 공정하고 공평한 대우를 보장하기 위한 규칙과 지침을 수립한다. 하지만 모든 국가가 미국과 조세조약을 체결한 것은 아니며, 현재 미국과 한국 간에는 상속 및 증여세 조약이 없는 상황이다.

미국 시민과 유사하게 미국 거주자도 사망 시 전 세계 자산 가치에 대해 과세를 받으므로 그들의 재산은 미국 상속세의 대상이 된다. 반면에, 미국 비거주자는 미국 “situs” 자산의 가치에 대해서만 과세를 받는다. 일반적으로, 미국 situs 자산에는 미국 내의 부동산, 미국에 위치한 유형 자산, 미국 내 사업 자산, 그리고 미국 기업의 주식 등이 포함된다. 미국 situs 자산의 정의는 해당하는 상속 및 증여세 조약에 의해 영향을 받을 수 있다.

미국 시민과 거주자는 자산의 위치와 관계없이 모든 일생 선물에 대해 과세를 받는다. 이에 반해, 미국 비거주자는 미국 내에 위치한 유형 자산과 부동산에 대한 증여에 한정하여 미국 증여세 과세 대상이 된다.

상속 및 증여세의 영향을 최소화하기 위해 개인은 연간 면제액이나 공제액을 활용할 수 있다. 이에는 배우자 공제 및 기타 공제가 포함된다. 남은 면제액은 과세 대상 증여나 유증을 상쇄시키는 데 사용될 수 있다. 다만, 개인이 일생동안 사용한 면제액은 사망 시 면제액으로 사용할 수 없다는 점을 유념해야 한다. 미국 비거주자는 일생동안 사용 가능한 면제액이 없으며, 미국 비거주자의 사망 시 증여에 대한 면제액은 단지 6만 달러이다.

뿐만 아니라 개인은 상속 및 증여세와 함께 세대생략세 GST tax (generation-skipping transfer tax)도 고려해야 한다. GST tax는 상속세나 증여세에 추가로 부과되며, 증여자로부터 두 세대 이상 아래에 있는 수증자들 (예: 손자, 손녀)에게 이루어지는 특정 증여에 적용된다. 또한, GST tax는 증여자보다 37.5세 이상 어린 친족이 아닌 개인들에게 이루어지는 증여에도 적용된다. 그러나 특정 상황에서는 GST 연간 면제액을 사용할 수 있으며, GST tax에서 $12,060,000 (상속 및 증여세 면제액과 동일하게 인플레이션에 따라 조정)에 해당하는 자산을 면제시킬 수 있는 GST 면제액이 존재한다.

미국에 거주 혹은 근무하거나 미국에 재산을 소유하고 있는 미국 비시민들은 미국 상속 및 증여세 규정으로 인해 발생할 수 있는 잠재적 영향에 대한 이해를 가지고 있어야 한다. 거주지 선택은 개인의 재무설계와 부의 보전 전략에 상당한 세금 영향을 미칠 수 있다. 이러한 상황에 있는 개인들은 개별 상황을 고려하여 세금 영향을 판단하고 적절한 대응 방안을 모색하기 위해 국제 estate planning 전문가의 지도를 받을 것을 권장한다.

고려해야 할 중요한 주의사항은 현재의 $12,060,000 면제액이 일시적이며 2025년까지만 적용된다는 점이다. 의회가 영구적인 변경을 시행하지 않는 한, 면제액은 2025년 이후에 인플레이션을 고려한 $5.49백만 달러로 되돌아갈 것이다. 따라서 개인들은 이 면제액이 만료되기 전에 어떻게 최대한 활용할지 탐색하는 것이 중요하다.

또한, 미국 시민권을 포기하는 미국 시민들과 장기 거주자들 (IRC section 877(e)에서 정의된 바에 따른)은 IRS section 877A에 따라 국적포기세를 부과받을 수 있다. 해당 대상 개인들은 국적포기 연도에 미실현 이익의 순액에 대해 소득세를 부과받으며, 이는 마치 그 자산이 시장 가치에 따라 판매된 것으로 간주되는 “mark-to-market tax”이라고도 한다. 자세한 내용은 다음 뉴스레터에서 살펴보도록 하겠다.

개인과 기업들 사이에서 글로벌 이동성이 점차 보편화되면서 다국적 세금 규정에 영향을 받는 사람들이 증가할 것으로 예상된다. 미국 자산을 취득하거나 미국으로 이주를 계획하는 개인들은 잠재적인 미국 상속세와 증여세 영향에 대비하기 위해 필요한 조치를 신중하게 고려해야 한다.

Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is proposing changes to the income statement presentation for public businesses, with the primary objective being the disaggregation of expenses in the income statement and related footnote disclosures. This means that companies would need to provide a more detailed breakdown of their expenses, including costs that are initially capitalized as part of inventory and later expensed when sold. The FASB is focusing on disclosing the total "natural cost" incurred and reconciling it to the amount expensed, which is particularly relevant for costs that are capitalized in inventory and then flow through the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) when the inventory is sold.

For publicly traded companies, this disclosure requirement will impact their income statements. It's worth noting that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has already implemented a fully disaggregated disclosure requirement for companies using IFRS. As a result, U.S. companies with parent companies in Korea, subject to the full disclosure rule, might also need to furnish relevant information to meet these requirements.

If you're looking for more information or a deeper understanding, you can refer to the resources provided, such as the video and the Proposed Accounting Standards Update from FASB that offers an overview of the proposed rule regarding the disaggregation of income statements. This should aid in comprehending the new requirement and its implications for financial reporting.

Video Clip: Disaggregation—Income Statement Expenses: A Deeper Dive - YouTube

Proposed Accounting Standards Update: Proposed Accounting Standards Update—Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40)—Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (fasb.org)

Overall, the key concept is that the FASB wants companies to disclose the detailed breakdown of expenses, including those that are initially capitalized and later expensed, such as labor costs related to manufacturing inventory. This disclosure aims to provide a clearer picture of the financial performance and cost structure of businesses.