Category Archives: News / Updates

생명과학 및 연구 개발 산업

생명과학 및 연구 개발 산업

생명 과학 산업은 샌디에고 경제의 주요 부문이다. 샌디에고에는1,100 개 이상의 생명 과학 회사와 80 개 이상의 연구 기관이있으며 Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck 등 주요 제약 회사들이 주변 연구 기관, 대학교, 그리고 생명 공학 기업들과 협력하여 거대한 생명과학 산업을 이루고 있다.

이 산업에서 연구 및 개발은 막대한 양의 자본을 필요로 하며, 보통 관련된 회사들은 수익을 창출하기까지 수억달러를 투자해야한다. 연구 시작에 앞서 자금확보는 회사가 가장 처음 직면하는 위험요소이며 가장 중요한 단계일 것이다. 필자는 좋은 아이디어를 가지고 있음에도 불구하고 투자자 확보 및 금융전략에 실패하여 빛을 보지 못하고 파산하는 많은 회사들을 보았다.

현재 회사가 계속되는 적자로 인하여 세금을 내고 있지 않다고 하더라도 세무전략을 세우는것은 매우 중요하다. 세무 전략을 통해 투자자들 뿐만 아니라 금융기관에서 평가하는 투자 가치를 증가 시킬 수 있으며 이것은 미래의 이익을 최대화 할 수 있는 방법이기도 하다. 필자는 이와 관련된 기업 및 회사들이 고려 및 반영해 볼 만한 세무전략을 몇가지 소개 하려고 한다.

 

R & D Credit

지금까지 많은 스타트업 회사들이 순영업손실 (net operating loss)로 인하여 연구개발 세액공제 (R&D Credit)를 신청할 필요성을 느끼지 못했을 것이다. 하지만, 2015년 새로운 세법 (Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act.)이 제정되면서 조건에 해당하는 small to mid-sized 회사들은 수입이 증가하면서 생기는 법인대체최소세 (Alternative Minimum Tax - AMT)와 고용주가 부담하는 사회보장세 (FICA Tax)에 대한 공제를 받을 수 있게 되었다. 또한, 회사에 소득이 발생하는 시점에 이월하여 사용할 수 있는 크레딧을 적절한 문서화를 통하여 쌓아 갈 수 있다. 이러한 미래형 세금자산 확보는 회사자금의 유동성 확보 및 투자가치상승을 위한 벤처 캐피탈 및 금융기관의 기업평가에 아주 직접적인 영향을 줄 것이다.

Start-up tax losses

세무 상 자본 손실은 이월 기간을 제한하고 있다. 이월 기간 내에 사용되지 않은 모든 손실은 만료기간이 되면 사라지기 때문에 공제 받을 수 있는 타이밍을 관리하고 세무 상 손실의 수명을 연장하기 위해 특정 세금 election 을 이용하는 방법이 중요하다. 또한, 대부분의 회사들은 equity rounds를 이용해 운영 자금을 충당한다. 미국 세입법 (IRC 382)에 따르면 회사 소유권이 변경이 있을 때 마다 세무 상 손실금을 활용하는 금액을 제한한다. 올바른 세금 계획은 이러한 세금 혜택 손실을 최소화하고 법인세 자산 가치를 보존하기 위한 필수 사항이다.

Equity-based compensation

핵심 인재 유지는 많은 초기 단계의 생명 과학 기업이 직면 한 주요 과제 중 하나이다. 많은 기업들이 인재를 유치하기 위해 다양한 형태의 비 현금 보상을 제공한다. 이때 회사가 선택할 수있는 주식 기준 보상 등 여러가지 유형이 있으며, 유형마다 세금 및 재정에 서로 다른 영향을 미친다. 주식 기준 보상을 구현하기 전에 방법의 메커니즘을 알고 장단점을 모두 고려하여 선택해야 할 것이다.

Final Regulations under IRC section 385

최근 미국세청 (IRS)에서 Relate party (특수관계) 사이에서 발생한 채무관계를 정의하는 객관적 기준을 제시하는 규정을 (Regulations under IRC section 385) 발표했다. 해당규정에서는 증빙서류 없이 일어난 회사간의 부채는 소득세 목적으로 “주식”과 같이 취급한다고 명시하고 있다. 즉, 비용처리를 목적으로 사용된 이자비용은 배당금으로 취급한다. 2016년 4월 4일 이후 특수관계 사이에서 발행된 채무증서가 있다면 과세당국과의 충돌을 피하기위해 세금전문가의 도움을 받아 해결할것을 권한다.

International Tax Compliance Issues

소득 이전을 통한 세원 잠식 (Base Erosion and Profit Sharing - BEPS), 매출 축소(Earnings Stripping), 조세 전도(Inversion), 원가분담약정(Cost Share Arrangement) 및 무형자산 이전(Intangible Property Migration)은 근래에 들어 IRS에서 주시하는 주요 항목들이다. IRS는 해당 분야에서 발생하는 문제들에 대하여 추가준수사항 및 엄격한 규정들을 제시하고있다. 이 에 해당하는 세금 문제들은 IRS에 의해 면밀히 조사되며, 불응시 상상할 수 없는 결과를 초래할 수 있다. 다국적 기업은 세금 전문가의 도움을 받아 빠르게 변하고있는 세법을 준수하며 사업 전략 및 세법 전략을 계획하여야 한다.

Click here for English version of this article.

Life Sciences

Life Sciences

The life sciences industry is a major sector of economy of San Diego.  The region has more than 1,100 life sciences companies and more than 80 research institutes.  Major pharmaceutical companies including Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck maintain a presence in San Diego to foster collaboration with major research institutions, universities and many biotech companies.

Drug discovery and development is very capital intensive.  Companies need to invest hundreds of millions of dollars before they can start generating any revenue.  Financing is probably the greatest risk companies face in their early stages, and I have witnessed many companies with great ideas gone bankrupt because they weren’t quite ready for major investment from VCs or financing strategies.

Even in years when companies incur no tax liability because of operating losses, proper tax planning is important to maximize the future benefits of current investments and the valuation VCs and banks look at before they hand out money.  So I like to share some of the key tax planning ideas that life sciences companies should consider.

 

R&D credit

Up until now, start-up companies saw no immediate need for claiming Research and Development tax credit because of their net operating loss position.  However, with the enactment of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015, many small to mid-sized businesses may now use the credit against alternative minimum tax and offset the FICA employer portion of payroll tax, if certain conditions are met.  Also, having a proper documentation in place can secure the credit carryforwards that can be used later years when the companies start generating taxable income.  This future tax asset will have a direct impact to future cash flow and therefore impacts the value of the companies, VCs and banks evaluate when making investment decisions.

Start-up tax losses

Tax losses have limited carryforward periods.  Any losses that are not used within the carryforward periods will be expired and gone.  So it is very important to manage timing of deductions and utilize certain tax elections to prolong the life of tax losses.  Additionally, many of these companies undergo a number of equity rounds to finance the operation.  IRC section 382 limits the ability to utilize these tax losses when certain ownership changes take places.  Certain tax planning can be implemented to minimize these limitations to preserve these valuable tax losses – tax assets.

Deferred compensation

Retention of key talents is one of the main challenges many early-stage life science companies face.  Many companies offer noncash compensation in various forms to retain and attract these talents.  There are various types of equity-based compensation that companies can choose from, and each of them have different tax and financial impact.  Before implementing equity-based compensation, companies must be aware of mechanics of how these awards work and consider pros and cons.

Final Regulations under IRC section 385

IRS recently issued final regulations under IRC section 385 providing objective criteria to sustain debt treatment for tax purposes of intercompany debt issued among related parties.  Without an adequate documentation required under the regulations, certain intercompany debt would be treated as stock for income tax purposes.  In other words, financing cost intended to be treated as interest expense would potentially be re-characterized as dividend.   Related party debt instruments issued on after April 4, 2016 must be analyzed by confident tax professionals to avoid any conflicts with taxing authorities.

International Tax Compliance Issues

BEPS, Earnings Stripping, Inversion, Cost Share Arrangement and IP migration – these are some of the key matters IRS recently provided additional compliance requirements and more stringent rules around.  Tax issues related to these matters are heavily scrutinized and noncompliance can result in unimaginable consequences.  Multinational companies must retain qualifying tax professionals to be in compliance with these fast revolving tax laws.

Click here for Korean version of this article.

New Sales Tax Bill Proposed By Rep. Senesenbrenner

New Sales Tax Bill Proposed By Rep. Senesenbrenner

Rep. Sensenbrenner recently proposed H.R. 5893 “No Regulation Without Representation Act of 2016.”  This bill would provide more objective physical presence threshold for states’ right to subject taxpayers for sales tax collection responsibilities.

If H.R. 5893 passes, states would be limited in what they can consider nexus.  A seller under the new bill would be someone who has physical presence in a state.  Nexus is triggered only if a taxpayer is physically located or have personal property or employee in the state.  This means Amazon FBA sellers are no longer on the hook to collect and remit sales tax in states where the seller’s only connection with a state is inventory in an Amazon fulfillment warehouse.

Still long way to  – need to be passed by House, Senate, and the President.  We expect that states would fight hard to dismiss this new bill, but we will continually monitor the passage of this new bill.

Nevada Commerce Tax Return

Nevada Commerce Tax Return

Nevada enacted the state’s first business activity tax – the “Commerce Tax” in 2015. Opponents of this new tax regime tried very hard to repeal it but the efforts were unsuccessful.  The Commerce Tax is a gross receipts tax that is imposed on gross revenue sourced to Nevada.

Effective July 1, 2015, all taxpayers (including C corp, S corp, LLC, Parternship, Trust, and Individuals) engaged in business in Nevada are required to file Form TXR-030.01 by August 15, 2016 for the initial report cover year from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016.  A 30-day extension can be requested if additional time is required.  This gross receipt tax is imposed on Nevada source gross revenue in excess of $4 million, but the return filing requirement is nevertheless required for taxpayers with Nevada source gross revenue lesser than $4 million.

Tax Form: http://tax.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/taxnvgov/Content/Commerce/COM_Tax_Return.pdf

Instructions: http://tax.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/taxnvgov/Content/Commerce/Commerce_Tax_Instructions_June16_2016.pdf

FASB Decision to change Income Tax Accounting for Intra-entity Assets Transfers

FASB Decision to change Income Tax Accounting for Intra-entity Assets Transfers

FASB decided to require an entity to recognize income tax impact of an intra-entity asset transfer, other than an intra-entity asset transfer of inventory.

An intercompany sale or purchase of assets between entities in different taxing jurisdictions is a taxable event for the seller and a new tax basis for the buyer. Under current guidance under ASC 810 and 740, intra-entity balances, transactions, and profit or loss on assets remaining within the consolidation group be eliminated and the related tax impacts (i.e., tax payable on gain by the seller and deferred tax asset related to tax basis adjustment to buyer) are not recognized for US GAAP based financial statement purposes.

However, this non-recognition treatment will be eliminated from US GAAP, except for intra-entity asset transfer of inventory. This amendment is expected to be effective annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 for public entities and December 15, 2018 for all other entities. Early adoption is permissible.

Please see the attached FASB meeting minute below.

Intra-Entity Asset Transfers.pdf

Annual Report Requirements for Multinational Companies

Annual Report Requirements for Multinational Companies

Added to the already overwhelming various international information disclosure requirements, the IRS issued final regulations requiring large US multinational companies to file annual report disclosing certain information on a country-by-country basis related to their income and tax payments. The regulations are issued in connection with the BEPS implementation by the US government.

Generally, the filing requirement apply to US taxpayers that are the ultimate parent entities of multinational enterprise group with prior year annual revenue in excess of $850 million. The regulations are effective tax years beginning on or after July 1, 2016.

Click below link to see a copy of 1.6838-4 for your reference.

Final reg Country-by-country report.pdf

Proposed Section 385 Regulations

Proposed Section 385 Regulations

In April 2016, IRS issued proposed regulations under IRC section 385 which would dramatically change the treatment of intercompany debt issued among the members of certain corporate groups. The proposed regulations would apply to debt instruments issued on or after April 4, 2016 if finalize. Based on the President’s public remarks targeting corporate inversions, tax professionals expect IRS to finalize this package before the end of the Obama Administration. In general, the proposed regulations would:

• Treat as stock certain related-party interests that otherwise would be treated as indebtedness for federal tax purposes.
• Authorize the IRS to treat certain related-party interests in a corporate as indebtedness in part and stock in part for federal tax purposes.
• Established extensive documentation requirements in order for certain related-party interest in a corporation to be treated as indebtedness for federal tax purposes.

If the documentation and information requirements are not satisfied on a timely basis, then the instrument will be treated as equity for federal income tax purposes. The documentation and information that must be prepared on a timely basis to satisfy the requirements of this section include written documentation establishing:

• That the issuer has entered into an unconditional and legally binding obligation to pay on demand at one or more fixed dates,
• That the holder has the rights of creditor to enforce the obligation,
• That, as of the date of issuance of the instrument and taking into account all the relevant circumstances, the issuer’s financial position supported a reasonable expectation that the issuer intended to, and would be able to, meet its obligations pursuant to the terms of the instrument,
• Evidence of payments of principal and interest, and in the event payments were not made, the holder’s efforts to assert its rights as creditor.

    Take Away

When companies issue debt instruments to related corporations and partnerships, the instruments must have characteristics in form and in substance, and must fulfill documentation requirement provided under the 385 regulations to avoid any complicit with taxing authorities.

FATCA Reporting Requirement for Domestic Entities

FATCA Reporting Requirement for Domestic Entities

IRS has announced about the final regulations of 6038D requiring a “specific domestic entity” to make an annual disclosure of its specific foreign financial assets. This regulation is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015.

The final regulations extend the Form 8938 reporting requirement to specific domestic entities. A specific domestic entity is defined as a domestic corporation, domestic partnership or a domestic trust “formed or availed” of for purposes of holding (directly or indirectly) specific financial assets.

An entity is “formed or availed” for purpose of this regulation if below two conditions are met:

1. The entity must be closely held – 80% constructive ownership requirement.
2. At least 50 percent of income or assets are passive in nature.

It is anticipated that the IRS will modify current Form 8938 to incorporate entity filers. Please refer to the Regulation section 6038D-6 (attached below) or contact our office for further detail.

6038D Final Reg.pdf

Surprise tax bills for Foreign Companies

Surprise tax bills for Foreign Companies

많은 외국계 기업들이 국제 조세협약을 통해 미 연방과세 없이 미국내에 매출을 발생시키고 있는데, 이는 “고정사업장”(“ PE”) 이라는 중요한 요인에 의해 결정된다. 즉, “PE” 를 야기시키지 않는다면 미 연방 정부 과세로부터 보호를 받을 수 있다는 것이다.

하지만 미국내의 50개주는 연방 정부 세법에 준하지 않으며, 각자 주별로 독립된 세법이 존재한다. 이러한 이유에서, 기업들은 연방 정부에는 과세의무를 가지고 있지 않더라도 주 정부 차원에서는 과세의무를 가질 수있다. 보통 주 정부의 과세 기준은 재고, 종업원, 고정자산, 창고 혹은 사무실등의 요소들이 실제로 존재하는가에 따라 결정된다 (“Physical Presence Test”). 하지만, 최근 약 40개의 주들이 각자 독자적인 경제 넥서스 (Economic Nexus) 라는 기준을 도입하였다. 각 주의 독자적인 경제 넥서스 기준에 따라, 기업들의 매출이 경제적 연관성을 가지고 있다고 보여진다면, 상기 요소의 존재 유무와 상관없이 그들에게 과세의 의무를 가지도록 하고있다.

예를 들어, California의 경제 넥서스 (Economic Nexus)는 기업이 실질적으로 주 내에 사업장을 가지고 있지 않더라도 연간 매출액이 $500,000 이상이되면 과세의 의무를 가지고 있다고 본다.

만약, 어떤 외국계 기업의 미국 내 자회사가 미국내에서 발생한 소득만을 보고하도록 하는 Water’s edge election(WE) 을 통해 과세소득을 보고한다. 그리고, 이 외국계 기업과 미국 내의 자회사가 경제 넥서스 (Economic Nexus) 기준아래 경제적 연관성을 가진 이익을 창출하고, 서로 동일한 회사 (Unitary Relation) 로 간주된다면, 주 세무 당국 감사자들은 자회사의 WE를 통한 미국 내 과세소득 보고는 무효화 될 수 있다고 보고있다.

또한, 이런 경우, 전 세계에서 발생한 매출을 기준으로 하는 과세의무와 단지 WE 에서 계산된 과세의무의 차이는 클 수 있으며, WE 방식으로만 계산된 과세의무는 무시될 수 있다. 최근, California 주 세무 당국 감사 요원들은 이러한 문제에 관해 교육을 받았으며, 감사시, 이 issue 에 대해 적극적으로 조사하고 있다.

현 경제 넥서스 (Economic Nexus) 기준에서는, 많은 외국계 기업들이 상당한 납세의무, 가산세, 이자에 잠재적으로 노출되어있다. 따라서, 미국내 매출이 많은 외국계 기업들은 주 과세를 계산하는 과정에서 생기는 이러한 혼란을 피하기 위해서 경제 넥서스 (Economic Nexus)로 인한 세무영향 및 Water’s Edge Election 의 잠재적 영향을 평가해 볼 필요가 있다.

Increase Enforcement of IRC Section 6038B Disclosure Requirements

Increase Enforcement of IRC Section 6038B Disclosure Requirements

The IRS Large Business and International (LB&I) division publicly announced that it will increase enforcement of IRC section 6038B disclosure requirement. A formal training material has been distributed to field agents, and each entity needs to ensure that it is in compliance of the disclosure requirement. https://www.irs.gov/pub/int_practice_units/fen9433_01_12r.pdf

Here is a quick summary of IRC section 6038B.

Under IRC section 6038B, a disclosure must be made with annual return when:

(1) US person (i.e. individuals, corporations, estates and trusts) transfer property to a foreign corporation in exchange for sections 332, 351, 354, 355, 356 or 361 (mainly stock related exchanges – see additional info below);
(2) US person contributes property to a foreign partnership; or
(3) US person makes a distribution under 336 to a person who is not a US person

Failure to comply with the reporting requirement may result in a penalty equal to 10 percent of the value of transferred property up to $100,000. Please ensure that you file Form 926 to fulfill the 6038B reporting requirement when applicable.

332 – liquidation
351 - in exchange for stock
354 – Reorganization
355 – Distribution
356 – Additional consideration
361 – nontaxable distribution
721 – partnership contribution
336 – property distribution in a complete liquidation

If you have any question regarding this update, please contact our office.